200 Million Gasless Transactions in One Month, Is Account Abstraction a Trend or a Bubble?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/22 14:30:04
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: The Real State of Gasless Web3
Original Article Author: Stacy Muur, Cryptocurrency Researcher
Original Article Translation: DeepSeek

Editor's Note: The article summarizes that within 30 days, 89 projects on 9 blockchains achieved over 2 million gasless transactions through ERC-4337 smart wallets, saving approximately $11,700 in gas fees, demonstrating the significant potential of the Paymaster payment model to enhance on-chain activity. However, the surge in transaction volume may mask the true user demand, as one-time activities such as NFT minting and airdrops lead to a short-term spike in wallet numbers but with low retention rates, while a few games, DeFi, and infrastructure apps show deeper levels of reuse. Data indicates that while Gas sponsorship can attract users, sustained engagement relies on attractive applications. ERC-4337 has driven the mainstream adoption of gasless transactions but faces technical complexity and cost challenges. The future EIP-7702 is expected to further simplify and expedite its adoption.

The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for better readability):

Within a mere 30 days, 89 projects on 9 blockchains facilitated over 2 million gasless transactions, saving up to $11,700 in gas fees.

The wave of gasless transactions across multiple chains indicates that solutions like those in ERC-4337 smart wallets, where fees are paid by Paymasters, can rapidly boost on-chain activity.

Paymaster-Driven Adoption May Mask True User Demand

· The surge in transaction volume may not necessarily reflect genuine user interest, especially when a small number of wallets (such as traders, bots) repeatedly call contracts.

· One-time airdrops, free minting, or claiming activities may lead to a short-term spike in wallet numbers, but subsequent usage rates are extremely low.

New wallet numbers for NFTs, games, and token projects have seen a surge, but many wallets are used only for one-off operations (such as minting or claiming rewards) rather than ongoing engagement.

On the other hand, a few applications have demonstrated deeper, repetitive usage, typically driven by more engaging game loops, repetitive DeFi actions, or infrastructure-level services.

These findings indicate that ERC-4337 smart wallets are reshaping on-chain activity, showcasing both the power of Gas sponsorship to attract users and the need for attractive, reusable applications to maintain user engagement.

@0xKofi has built an authoritative dashboard to track this explosive growth, with data provided by @base.

200 Million Gasless Transactions in One Month, Is Account Abstraction a Trend or a Bubble?

Key Metrics

· 89 unique apps/protocols

· Approximately 724,000 active smart wallets

· Approximately $11,700 waived in Gas fees

· Approximately 2,087,799 Gasless transactions

Development of ERC-4337

The rapid growth of Gasless transactions is part of a larger trend. In 2024, ERC-4337 accounts executed over 103 million User Operations (UserOps), more than 10 times the 8.3 million in 2023. 87% of these transactions had their fees paid by Paymasters, enabling a Gasless experience.

From the monthly Paymaster Gas expenditure chart, we can observe the following evolution:

· Early Adoption (2023): Little expenditure before mid-2023, with Optimism leading the early adoption.

· Growth Phase (Late 2023): By October 2023, monthly expenditure steadily increased to around $400,000.

· Peak Activity (April 2024): Expenditure surged to around $700,000, primarily driven by Base.

· Recent Trends (Late 2024 to Early 2025): After reaching a new high in November to December 2024 (around $630,000), monthly Gas expenditure has significantly dropped in early 2025, down to around $150,000 in February.

Through Paymaster, apps and users have spent over $3.4 million on UserOp fees, with main providers including @biconomy, @pimlicoHQ, @coinbase, and @Alchemy. Despite the market contraction, overall spending in the first quarter of 2025 shows a downward trend, with @base ($391,117), @ethereum ($121,053), and @BNBCHAIN (approximately $112,493) still leading.

On-Chain Activity Ranking

· Base (43.2%): Entertainment and Social Hub — Dominant in Gaming (76.8%).

· Polygon (21.4%): Community Engagement Layer — NFTs (50.7%) and Telegram Wallet (42.3%).

· Optimism (8.5%): Security-Focused — Emphasizing Infrastructure Resilience.

· Celo (7.4%): Niche Expertise — Forecasting Market.

· BSC (4.2%): Value Transfer Layer — Token-Focused, Highest Gas Costs.

Data Analysis

Before delving into data analysis, it is crucial to understand two key metrics:

· Tx/Wallet (Transactions per Wallet) — Measures the average number of transactions completed per wallet. A low value (e.g., ~1.0) indicates one-time usage activities (e.g., minting NFTs or claiming airdrops). A high value (e.g., ~25) indicates repeated engagement (e.g., active trading, gaming, or bot operations).

· Cost/Tx (Cost per Transaction) — Represents the average cost per transaction. In a Gasless system, it reflects the fee waived per transaction rather than the fee paid by the user.

1. NFT Projects: Numerous Wallets Usually = One-Time Accounts

· Piggybox: → Approximately 1 tx/wallet, ~$0.004/transaction.

· Somon Badge: → Approximately 1.4 tx/wallet, ~$0.007/transaction.

Interpretation: The 1:1 wallet-to-transaction ratio (Piggybox) strongly suggests minting or claiming activity. Piggybox is an NFT obtained during EARN'M registration, plus a lottery box that may yield EARNM tokens.

One-Time Surge: Many wallets engage in only one transaction (initial minting/claiming) and do not return thereafter, hence the near-perfect 1:1 ratio.

Ranking: Due to many new wallets engaging in minting, Piggybox ranks high on the overall leaderboard. However, if excluding one-time wallets, it might drop from the top five, indicating very low retention rates.

2. Token: Concentration of Token Transactions in a Few Projects

The list includes 26 token projects, far exceeding other categories. Two tokens, $BVRP and $USDC, accounted for over 667k transactions, representing the majority of the transaction volume.

· $BVRP: → ~25 tx/wallet at $0.012/tx.

· $USDC: → ~4.6 tx/wallet at $0.21/tx.

Interpretation:

· This concentration indicates that not all "token" projects are equally active; rather, a few heavyweight projects are driving the total volume.

· $BVRP demonstrates high transaction activity relative to the number of wallets, indicating high user engagement on these platforms, with frequent automated or repetitive transactions.

3. Gaming: One "Hit Game," but Attention Needed on Wallet/Transaction Ratio

 · @SuperChampsHQ: → Approximately 1.49 tx/wallet, ~$0.017/transaction.

 · @BLOCKLORDS: → Approximately 42 tx/wallet, ~$0.009/transaction.

 · @miracleplay_cn: → Approximately 14 tx/wallet, ~$0.012/transaction.

 Interpretation:

 · Super Champs dominate the overall gaming usage (463k vs. the sum of others at ~13k), but each wallet executes only about 1-2 transactions.

 · Blocklords has fewer wallet numbers but an extremely high transactions per wallet ratio (~42). This is often related to robot-driven repetitive operations, as Blocklords' David Johansson stated: "They are fighting robots."

4. Bridging and Plugins: Moderate but Stable Usage, High Gas Costs

 · UniversalX: → Approximately 4.4 tx/wallet, ~$0.55/transaction.

 · Safe4337Module: → Approximately 5.1 tx/wallet, ~$0.053/transaction.

Interpretation:

 · Behind-the-Scenes Tools: Infrastructure tools like bridges and plugins do not have the same "headline" transaction volume as tokens or games, but they maintain stable usage due to multiple dApp dependencies.

 · Ecosystem Health Metrics: The moderate usage of infrastructure services indicates their real utility, rather than hype-driven spikes.

5. Chain Specialization Is Emerging

 · @base: 99.5% of gaming wallet activity (310,934 out of 312,361 wallets).

 · @0xPolygon: Dominant in NFT/social activity (87% of ecosystem NFT wallets).

 · @BNBCHAIN: Leading in high-value bridge transactions (23.2% of all Gasless transactions).

 · @Celo: Strong performance in prediction markets (25,574 wallets, 12.7 tx/wallet).

6. Cross-Chain Cost Differences

A 100x cost difference between different chains is driving specific application categories to concentrate on particular chains:

· Ethereum: $2.41 per Gasless transaction (highest).

· BSC: $0.50 per Gasless transaction.

· Base: $0.02 per Gasless transaction (lowest among major chains).

· Polygon: $0.03 per Gasless transaction. Argument: A 100x cost structure difference between different chains will lead to specific application categories concentrating on particular chains, regardless of technical similarities. Games and social apps are economically unfeasible on high-cost chains.

Overall Situation

· NFT adoption may involve minting to tens of thousands of wallets at once (e.g., Piggybox), but the reuse rate is extremely low.

· Infrastructure (bridges, plugins) remains stable with moderate transaction volume, usually with high per-transaction costs (bridges) or stable off-chain usage (plugins).

· The differences in per-wallet transaction counts across all categories highlight distinct usage patterns: some highly repetitive, while others are purely one-off interactions.

· Finally, the engagement of a large number of projects is close to zero, indicating that relying solely on free Gas is insufficient to generate demand; dApps need a real value proposition to retain users.

Summary

Account abstraction and Gas sponsorship can indeed boost transaction volume and user onboarding, but the real test is repeat engagement. By combining wallet counts, waived Gas fees, and no-Gas transaction volumes, the data highlights the phenomenon of concentrated usage within each category, often stemming from one or two star dApps or large-scale one-time claim events. Projects like Piggybox demonstrate how a near 1:1 ratio of wallets to transactions can propel an NFT project to the top ranks but may quickly fall off after filtering out one-time accounts. Meanwhile, bridge and plugin solutions demonstrate more stable moderate transaction volumes, reflecting the ecosystem's true needs rather than transient hype.

The Role of the ERC-4337 Smart Wallet

All these trends—Gasless gaming, seamless DeFi, chain specialization—are driven by the ERC-4337 Smart Wallet.

Unlike traditional EOAs (Externally Owned Accounts), smart wallets introduce automation, security, and flexibility, significantly enhancing the user experience.

What Is an ERC-4337 Smart Wallet?

A smart contract wallet or smart wallet is a programmable Ethereum account that enhances the user experience through the following functionalities:

Batch Transactions—Users can batch multiple operations (e.g., approve + swap on a DEX) into a single transaction.

Gas Fee Abstraction—Users do not need to hold ETH to pay gas fees; the fees can be covered by a sponsor or paid with other tokens.

Security—Users can authenticate themselves through passwords, social recovery, or multi-factor authentication instead of using less secure seed phrases.

How Does Gasless Transaction Work?

When a user initiates a transaction, the Paymaster (a special type of smart contract) can step in to pay the Gas fee or allow the user to pay using any held ERC-20 token. This significantly lowers the barrier of entry for new users, making blockchain applications seamless like Web2 apps.

However, ERC-4337 also faces significant adoption challenges, with the aforementioned retention issues possibly stemming directly from the following key limitations:

· Technical Barriers: Complex components like UserOperations, Bundlers, and EntryPoint contracts pose a steep learning curve for regular users and developers.

· Cost Concerns: While Gasless transactions are beneficial for users, implementing the full stack may be costly, and the profitability of Bundlers is unstable during Gas fluctuations.

· Reliability Issues: Network congestion can lead to transaction delays, and complex validation logic introduces potential security vulnerabilities.

· User Experience Gap: Multi-chain fragmentation results in inconsistent wallet experiences, hindering seamless cross-chain management.

Conclusion

Account abstraction and Gas sponsorship have successfully boosted transaction volume and new wallet registrations, but the real challenge is sustained engagement. Data shows:

· Many dApps experience one-time spikes in usage (such as NFT minting, airdrops), rather than long-term retention.

· A few projects drive the majority of activity, while many others struggle to attract genuine user demand.

· Bridging and infrastructure solutions demonstrate more stable usage rates, highlighting real utility over hype.

While ERC-4337 has achieved Gasless transactions and improved user experience, its complexity and cost barriers limit mainstream adoption. EIP-7702 addresses these issues by:

· Allowing EOAs to engage in account abstraction: The core issue with ERC-4337 was excluding EOAs, requiring users to switch to a smart contract wallet. EIP-7702 resolves this by allowing EOAs to temporarily adopt smart contract code, enabling access to Gas sponsorship (paying fees with ERC-20 tokens) and batch transactions (such as approving and spending ERC-20 tokens in a single transaction).

· Simplify Complexity and Cost: Allow EOA to temporarily adopt smart contract functionality, reduce the need for permanent wallet contracts, lower Gas expenses, and decrease reliance on Entry Points or Bundlers.

· Improve Efficiency: Introduce transaction type 0x04 for batch EOA operations, providing a more streamlined alternative to ERC-4337 UserOps.

· Simplify Infrastructure: Restrict smart contract code to transaction execution, reducing reliance on alternative mempools and Bundlers.

· Empower Developers: Integrate with ERC-4337 and provide a flexible, low-friction upgrade path.

While ERC-4337 laid the foundation, EIP-7702 will make smart wallets cheaper, simpler, more accessible, accelerating the next wave of Web3 adoption.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.