$5 Billion Airdrop Feast: Why Did the U.S. Become an "Outsider"?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/14 15:15:03
0
Share
copy
原文标题:《解读 DragonFly 2025 空投报告:加密空投,美国尚未分到的蛋糕》
原文来源:深潮 TechFlow

2025 年了,你曾经因为空投赚到过大毛吗?

如果你没有,那也不要难过,因为有些人甚至根本没有资格参与空投 --- 比如大洋彼岸的美国老铁们。

一个你很难相信的事实是,职业化撸毛的产业在中文圈都玩开花了,美国却因政策法规的限制,多数加密项目在制定空投政策时都会考虑避嫌,把美国地区的用户排除在外。

而今,随着美国政府各类亲加密政策的制定、总统各种加密相关的行动和更多美国企业开始屯比特币,美国在加密市场的话语权,从未像今天这么大过。

美国政策的变化,也在影响着空投市场的格局,更在为其他国家的创新提供参考。

在这种背景下,知名 VC Dragonfly 发布了《空投现状报告 2025》,试图通过数据和分析,量化美国政策对空投和加密经济的影响。

深潮 TechFlow 对该报告的核心观点进行了提炼和解读,汇总如下。

 Billion Airdrop Feast: Why Did the U.S. Become an

关键结论:美国用户和政府,并没有从空投中受益

1、美国用户因地理封锁受限:

· 受影响用户数量:2024 年,约 92 万至 520 万活跃美国用户(占美国加密货币持有者的 5%-10%)因地理封锁政策无法参与空投或使用某些项目。

· 美国用户占全球加密地址的比例:2024 年,全球活跃加密地址中,有 22%-24% 属于美国用户。

2、空投的经济价值:

· 空投总价值:在 11 个样本项目中,空投总价值约为 71.6 亿美元,全球约 190 万用户参与,每个地址的平均中位领取金额约为 4600 美元。

· 美国用户的收入损失:

在 11 个地理封锁的空投项目中,美国用户的收入损失估计为 18.4 亿至 26.4 亿美元(2020-2024 年)。

根据 CoinGecko 分析的 21 个地理封锁空投项目,美国用户的潜在收入损失可能高达 34.9 亿至 50.2 亿美元(2020-2024 年)。

3、税收损失:

· 个人税收损失:

联邦税收损失:约 4.18 亿至 11 亿美元(2020-2024 年)。

州税收损失:约 1.07 亿至 2.84 亿美元。

总体税收损失:约 5.25 亿至 13.8 亿美元,且未包括因代币出售产生的资本利得税收入。

· 企业税收损失:

由于加密公司外迁,美国错失大量企业税收。例如,Tether(USDT 发行方)2024 年利润达 62 亿美元,若完全受美国税收监管,本可贡献约 13 亿美元联邦税 和 3.16 亿美元州税。

4、加密公司外迁的影响:

加密货币公司因监管压力选择在海外注册和运营,进一步加剧了美国的税收损失。

Tether 仅为一个案例,说明整体行业外迁对美国经济的广泛负面影响。

为什么空投在美国受到限制?

美国的监管环境对空投市场的限制,源于法规的不确定性和高昂的合规成本。以下是关键原因:

1. 模糊的监管框架

美国监管机构(如 SEC 和 CFTC)倾向于通过执法行动确立规则,而非制定清晰的法律框架。这种「执法优先」的模式让加密项目难以预测哪些行为是合法的,尤其是空投这种新兴模式。

2. 空投可能被视为证券

根据美国证券法,SEC 通过 Howey 测试 判断某一资产是否属于证券。Howey 测试的核心在于:

· 是否涉及资金投资:即用户是否为获取该资产付出了资金或其他资源;

· 是否期待收益:用户是否期望通过资产的增值或项目方的努力获利;

· 是否依赖他人努力:收益是否主要来源于发行方或第三方的工作;

· 是否为共同事业:投资者之间是否共享收益和风险。

许多空投代币满足这些条件(如用户期待代币升值),因此被 SEC 认定为证券。这意味着项目方需要遵守繁琐的注册要求,否则可能面临高额罚款甚至刑事责任。为了规避这些风险,许多项目选择直接屏蔽美国用户。

3. 税务政策的复杂性

现行税法要求用户在领取空投时按代币市值缴纳收入税,即便代币尚未出售。这种不合理的税务负担,加上后续的资本利得税,进一步降低了美国用户参与空投的意愿。

4. 地理封锁的普遍化

为了避免被认定为向美国用户提供未注册证券,许多项目选择对美国用户进行地理封锁。这种策略不仅保护了项目方,也反映了美国监管环境对创新的抑制。

同时,报告也非常详尽的按照时间脉络,清晰的列出了美国加密监管法规对加密空投的态度变化,和关键项目的空投被排除在美国之外的事件。

加密项目怎么屏蔽美国用户?

这些措施既是为了保护自身的合规性,也是为了避免因无意违规而受到处罚。以下是常见的屏蔽手段:

1. 地理封锁(Geoblocking)

地理封锁通过设置虚拟边界,限制特定地区用户访问服务或内容。项目通常利用用户的 IP 地址、DNS 服务国家、支付信息位置,甚至在线购物时的语言设置来判断用户所在地区。如果用户被识别为来自美国,则会被屏蔽访问。

2. IP 地址封锁(IP Blocking)

IP 封锁是地理封锁的核心技术之一。每个互联网设备都有唯一的 IP 地址,当用户试图访问平台时,系统会通过防火墙阻止被标记为美国的 IP 地址。

3. VPN 封锁

虚拟专用网络(VPN)可以隐藏用户的真实 IP 地址以保护隐私,但项目方也会监控 VPN 服务器的流量。如果发现某一 IP 地址出现异常高的访问量或多样化的活动,平台可能会封锁这些 IP 地址,以防止美国用户通过 VPN 绕过限制。

4. KYC(了解你的客户)验证

许多平台要求用户完成 KYC 流程,提交身份信息以确认其非美国身份。一些项目甚至要求用户通过钱包签名的方式声明其非美国身份。这种方式不仅用于防止非法融资和洗钱,也成为屏蔽美国用户的重要手段。

5. 明确的法律声明

部分项目在空投或服务条款中明确声明,美国用户不得参与。这种「善意努力」旨在表明项目方已采取措施限制美国用户,从而减轻法律责任。

· 尽管项目方努力屏蔽美国用户,但美国监管机构(如 SEC 和 CFTC)并未提供明确的合规指导,导致项目方对「足够的屏蔽措施」缺乏清晰认知。

· 屏蔽措施也带来了运营成本和合规风险的增加。例如,依赖第三方地理封锁服务(如 Vercel)可能因数据错误而导致违规风险,而责任最终仍由项目方承担。

美国缺席加密空投,经济影响几何?

美国政策的限制,造成的经济损失有多大?

为了量化地理封锁政策对美国居民加密货币空投的影响,并评估这些政策的更广泛经济后果,报告分析估计了美国加密货币持有者的数量,评估了他们在空投中的参与情况,并界定了由于地理封锁而导致的潜在经济和税收损失。

具体操作上,报告选取了了 11 个被地理封锁的空投项目和 1 个非地理封锁的空投作为对照,并从人数和经济价值上做了深入的数据分析。

1. 美国用户的加密参与率

在美国估计有 1840 万到 5230 万的加密货币持有者中,2024 年每月活跃的美国用户大约有 92 万到 520 万,这些用户受到地理限制政策的影响,包括空投和对项目使用的更有限参与。

(原图来自报告,深潮 TechFlow 编译)

截至 2024 年,估计全球活跃的加密地址中有 22% 至 24% 属于美国居民。

我们对 11 个项目的样本生成的总价值约为 71.6 亿美元,其中大约 190 万人在全球范围内参与了空投领取,平均每个合格地址的中位数领取价值约为 4600 美元。

下表以按项目名称进行了金额的细分。

(原图来自报告,深潮 TechFlow 编译)

2. 美国用户未参与空投的损失

(原图来自报告,深潮 TechFlow 编译)

根据以上表格中的空投数据,预计美国居民在 2020 年至 2024 年期间错过了样本组的 18.4 亿美元到 26.4 亿美元的潜在收入。

税收损失

由于空投限制,2020 至 2024 导致的估计税收收入损失在 19 亿美元(报告样本估算的下限)到 50.2 亿美元(CoinGecko 其他研究中估算的上限)。

使用个人税率计算的相应联邦税收收入损失预计将在 4.18 亿美元到 11 亿美元之间,此外,州税收收入损失也大约在 1.07 亿美元到 2.84 亿美元之间。总的来说,美国这几年总的税收收入损失在 5.25 亿美元到 13.8 亿美元之间。

离岸损失:2024 年,Tether 报告利润 62 亿美元,超越了传统金融巨头如贝莱德。如果 Tether 总部设在美国,且需缴纳全部美国税收,则该利润将需缴纳 21% 的联邦企业税,估计为 13 亿美元的联邦税收。此外,考虑到平均州企业税率为 5.1%,预计将产生 3.16 亿美元的州税。合计来看,单单由于 Tether 的离岸状态造成的潜在税收损失可能每年约为 16 亿美元。

那些离开美国的加密公司们

一些公司已经完全退出美国,例如:

· Bittrex:它关闭了在美国的业务,认为这一决定是由于「监管不确定性」和执法行动频率的增加,尤其是来自 SEC 的执法,这使得其在美国开展业务「变得不可行」。

· Nexo:在与美国监管机构进行 18 个月无效对话后,逐步淘汰了美国的产品和服务。

· Revolut:这家总部位于英国的金融科技公司暂停了美国客户的加密货币服务,理由是监管环境的变化以及美国加密市场的持续不确定性。

其他公司正在为最坏的情况做准备(即没有监管清晰性和持续的执法监管),并开始在海外设立运营或转向非美国消费者。这些公司包括:

· Coinbase:作为美国最大的加密交易平台,它在百慕大开设了运营,以利用更有利的监管环境。

· Ripple Labs:与 SEC 进行了多年的漫长法律斗争。截至 2023 年 9 月,85% 的职位开放为海外人员,至 2023 年底,美国员工比例从 60% 降至 50%。

· Beaxy:在 2023 年 3 月,美国证券交易委员会控告该公司及其创始人 Artak Hamazaspyan 经营未注册的交易平台和经纪业务后,该交易平台发布公告称由于周围不确定的监管环境,决定暂停运营。

一些中肯的建议

1、为非融资目的的加密货币空投(Airdrops)建立「安全港」(Safe Harbor)机制:

发行方需提供代币经济学(如供应量、分配方式)、治理机制、潜在风险及任何使用限制的详细信息。

内部人员需遵守至少三个月的锁仓期,以防止内幕交易或抢先获利。

代币仅能通过非金钱形式的贡献(如服务、网络活动参与或先前持有资格)分发,直接的金钱交易将取消其安全港资格。

2、将美国《证券法》第 701 条(Rule 701)的适用范围扩展到技术平台的参与者,特别是通过空投或服务补偿形式分发的加密代币。

3、将加密货币空投的税收处理方式与信用卡奖励或促销礼品卡的税务规则对齐,以确保公平性和合理性。

· 空投代币在接收时不应被视为应税收入。

· 税收应在代币被出售或兑换为其他资产时征收,因为此时代币具备流动性并且拥有可量化的市场价值。

4、利用选举周期带来的政治过渡期为监管创新提供了独特机会。

5、SEC 应制定明确的规则,明确数字资产何时被视为证券;摒弃「通过执法监管」和「通过恐吓监管」的策略,转向正式规则制定。提供清晰的合规指导,帮助加密初创公司安心创新。

原文链接

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more