Bitcoin Revisits $80,000, What Are the Key Support and Resistance Levels?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/10 11:15:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Market Plunge, Bitcoin Once Again Tests $80K, Is the Bear Market Coming?"
Original Article Author: Luke, Mars Finance

Introduction

The cryptocurrency market is currently in a state of turmoil. Yesterday, on March 9, Bitcoin—the guiding star of the crypto world—plunged by 7%, retracing from its high, triggering widespread panic in the market. According to The Block data, the spot market trading volume on centralized exchanges (CEX) in February reached $1.77 trillion, hitting a new low for the year and declining by 23.7% from January's $2.32 trillion, indicating a significant contraction in market activity. Meanwhile, crypto analyst Miles Deutscher pointed out on social media that in the past 90 days, only 12 out of the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization have seen positive returns. For example, BERA surged by 579.63%, TRUMP rose by 85.61%, while Bitcoin plummeted by 13.47% and LINK suffered a massive 40% drop. This sharp divergence alongside the decline in trading volume paints a picture of extreme market panic. So, does this mean the bear market has quietly arrived?

Bitcoin Revisits $80,000, What Are the Key Support and Resistance Levels?

Market Sentiment and Fear Index

Market sentiment is one of the key indicators for trend analysis, and liquidation data, as a direct reflection of market sentiment, provides vital supplementary information for this analysis. Currently, the Cryptocurrency Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 35, indicating "fear," a significant drop from the "extreme greed" level of 70 a month ago, reflecting a rapid deterioration in investor confidence. Glassnode's Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) indicator further confirms this trend, dropping from 0.6 (high greed) to 0.2, approaching levels seen at the beginning of historical bear markets. Usually, levels below 0 indicate the market entering a capitulation phase, and the current value suggests that while the market has not completely collapsed yet, the panic sentiment is approaching a critical point.

CryptoQuant data shows that the demand growth in the Bitcoin spot market is slowing down, and the proportion of short positions in the futures market's open interest has significantly increased. As of March 9, short positions in CME Bitcoin futures accounted for 45% of the total open interest, rising by 15 percentage points from the 30% in early February. This dominance of short positions has intensified market panic sentiment, with investors enhancing their expectations for price declines, and some even discussing whether Bitcoin will break below the psychological barrier of $60,000.

Liquidation data further reveals market dynamics, with BTC liquidated amount reaching $4.7072 million and ETH $1.3061 million in the past 1 hour, totaling $11.5482 million. Long liquidations amounted to $8.2925 million, while short liquidations reached $24.3301 million, indicating a significant imbalance favoring shorts which could lead to a short squeeze and a short-term bounce. Over the past 24 hours, total liquidations hit $616 million, with longs liquidated at $540 million and shorts at $76.3075 million, showcasing prolonged bearish pressure. This aligns with the worsening NUPL and rising short positions, indicating both short-term volatility and long-term risk. Investors need to be cautious of this complexity, focus on short squeeze opportunities, and guard against downside risks in a bear market.

Technical Analysis: Key Support and Resistance Levels

From a technical perspective, the Bitcoin price is at a critical juncture. Following the consolidation from November 20, 2024, to February 24, 2025, after reaching a high, the price has formed a potential double top pattern—a typical bearish signal. After breaking below the double top neckline, the price dropped from a high of $82,000 to around $76,000, with a nearly achieved target range of approximately 10%. However, the time aspect of this move has not been fully absorbed.

Analysts generally believe the market may face two scenarios:

· Scenario 1: Time for Space If $78,000 holds as the bottom, both bulls and bears need to patiently wait for two to three months to confirm the trend. Currently, the range between the 50-day moving average (around $77,500) and the 200-day moving average (around $72,000) has become a short-term battleground. If the price can hold above $78,000, it may form a W-bottom pattern, laying the foundation for a subsequent rebound.

· Scenario 2: Further Downside If bearish momentum prevails, the price might decline to the high liquidity area of $70,000-$72,000. This region not only serves as the support of the 200-day moving average but also marks a significant retracement level after the rebound from the low point in August 2024. Trader Eugene Ng Ah Sio stated in a Telegram group, "I'm not eager to engage in spot trading at the current price; $75,000 is the only level that interests me." This cautious approach reflects market uncertainty.

Additionally, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is currently at 42, dropping from overbought territory (above 70) to a neutral to slightly oversold level, suggesting a relief in short-term selling pressure but not yet entering oversold territory (below 30). Technical analysis advises investors to stay on the sidelines, avoid chasing the market blindly, and wait for a clearer trend.

Macroeconomic Background: Diminished Bullish Factors and Uncertainty

The impact of macroeconomic factors on the cryptocurrency market cannot be ignored. Firstly, changes in the global interest rate environment are putting pressure on high-risk assets. The US 10-year Treasury yield recently rose to 4.2%, up 40 basis points from the beginning of the year at 3.8%, attracting funds flowing back from the crypto market to traditional safe-haven assets. At the same time, persistent inflation expectations and the possibility of the Federal Reserve delaying rate cuts further diminish the attractiveness of Bitcoin as "digital gold."

On the legislative front, the weakening of bullish news has also exacerbated market pressure. Taking the example of the Bitcoin bill in Utah, the bill was passed in the state Senate on March 7 with 19 votes in favor and 7 against, and is set to be signed into law by the governor. However, its core provision—allowing the state of Utah to hold Bitcoin as a reserve asset—was removed in the final deliberation. The original provision would have authorized the state treasurer to invest in Bitcoin, with a cap of 5% of its market cap (approximately $25 billion), potentially making Utah the first state in the US to hold Bitcoin reserves. Now, the bill only retains provisions for custodial protection and basic rights related to Bitcoin mining and node operation, greatly diminishing its impact.

The exhaustion of macroeconomic bullish factors has shaken market confidence, while external uncertainties (such as the potential adjustment of crypto policies by the Trump administration) are adding to the market's unpredictability. Bloomberg analysts predict that if Trump is reelected, his tax cuts and deregulation policies could provide a short-term boost to the crypto market, but the long-term effects remain to be seen.

ETF Outflows: Decline in Institutional Enthusiasm

Institutional demand was a key driver of the Bitcoin price surge in 2024, but recent outflows from spot ETFs are a cause for concern. According to data from sosovalue, since March, net outflows from US Bitcoin spot ETFs have exceeded $500 million, with Grayscale's GBTC outflows being particularly pronounced. Julio Moreno, Director of Research at CryptoQuant, pointed out: "Bitcoin spot demand growth is contracting, while the futures market is dominated by short positions, which directly leads to price declines."

Jacob King, Founder of WhaleWire, put it more bluntly: "The Bitcoin bear market is here. ETF outflows are at a record high, the institutional demand narrative is crumbling, and Bitcoin is heading towards multi-year lows." While this view is somewhat extreme, the outflows from ETFs do reflect a decline in institutional enthusiasm. At the beginning of 2024, daily average net inflows into ETFs reached as high as $200 million, but now they have turned into net outflows, indicating that institutional investors are reevaluating the risk-return profile of crypto assets. This shift has dealt a further blow to market confidence.

On-Chain Data: Coexistence of Hope and Uncertainty

On-chain data provides the market with a ray of hope. According to Glassnode's analysis, the behavior of long-term holders (investors holding for over a year) is undergoing a transition from a distribution phase to an accumulation phase. As of March 9, the net position change of long-term holders has turned positive, with a daily average inflow of around 5,000 bitcoins. Historically, this shift in trend has often been a reliable signal of the market transitioning from a top to a bottom, such as during the formative periods of the bottoms in early 2019 and March 2020.

However, the current situation differs from past cycles. First, the price decline may be slow and sustained, only reaching a relative bottom when long-term holder holdings reach new highs (such as exceeding 700,000 coins). Second, the rise of spot ETFs has altered the holder composition. Arkham Intelligence data shows that ETF holders currently control around 4% of bitcoin's circulating supply (about 840,000 coins), while the proportion of traditional on-chain long-term holders has decreased from 65% in 2023 to 60%. This shift may weaken the predictive power of traditional on-chain metrics.

While the shift of long-term holders to a buying mode is encouraging, it is still in the early stages of inflow, and the possibility of a reversal has not been ruled out. Market bottom predictions still need to be validated with more external signals.

Historical Comparison: Similarities and Differences in Bear Markets

Looking back at history, the current market shares similarities with the bear markets of 2018 and 2022 but also exhibits significant differences. In 2018, bitcoin plummeted from $20,000 to $3,200, a drop of over 80%, accompanied by the bursting of the ICO bubble and a decline in trading volume; in 2022, it fell from $69,000 to $16,000, a drop of about 76%, impacted by the FTX collapse and rate hikes. However, the current decline of bitcoin from its high of $82,000 is around 7%-13%, far from the levels seen in historical bear markets.

Similarities lie in the decrease in trading volume and market segmentation. For instance, in 2018, CEX trading volumes dropped by 70% from their peak, while currently, it has only decreased by 23.7%. The difference lies in institutional participation and the emergence of ETFs, providing the market with a new cushioning mechanism. Therefore, the current panic may be a period of adjustment rather than a full-fledged bear market. But if ETF outflows continue to expand, a historical tragedy may replay.

Whether the market has entered a bear market is still inconclusive. Technically, the risk of a pullback remains, with key support levels like $78,000 and $75,000 being tested; macroscopically, limited positive news, exacerbated ETF outflows, and a weakening institutional narrative are observed; while on-chain data hints at increasing confidence from long-term holders, the bottom is still unclear. The current panic may be a harbinger of a deeper adjustment or a period of darkness before the dawn.

For investors, caution is key. As Miles Deutscher puts it: "This is a rotational market, where holders are being punished." Instead of chasing short-term price swings, it's better to focus on the intersection of technical support, macro trends, and on-chain signals. Drawing wisdom from Warren Buffett— "Be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy"—in the turbulent waves of the crypto market, risk management and a long-term perspective are the way to survival.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more