Copycat ETF Applications Surge, Is the Era of ETF 2.0 Approaching?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/06 12:30:03
0
Share
copy

After a high-profile announcement by Trump regarding a strategic reserve of cryptocurrency, traditional financial institutions were quick to react despite the lackluster market performance. Following the SEC's consecutive confirmations in February this year of several applications from American traditional giants for LTC, DOGE, SOL, and XRP ETFs, favorable policies and relaxed SEC regulations have led to frequent progress updates on Altcoin ETFs this week.

Latest Altcoins Applying for ETFs

The U.S. ETF application process follows this order: the issuer first submits S-1/S-3 forms, then the exchange submits a 19b-4 form, followed by a public comment period. The SEC then reviews and provides feedback, leading to final approval. The entire process typically takes around 6 to 8 months, depending on the SEC's review timeline. Below are the recent Altcoins applying for ETFs and their market performance data in the last 30 days, sorted by application submission date.

Cardano (ADA)

On February 25, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) confirmed the acceptance of NYSE Arca's application, on behalf of Grayscale, for a spot Cardano (ADA) ETF. The application, submitted on February 10, will be custodied by Coinbase Custody Trust Company, with BNY Mellon handling asset servicing and administrative management.

On March 2, Trump made a social media post "pumping" ADA as part of his cryptocurrency strategic reserve, causing ADA to surge over 70% that day.

Copycat ETF Applications Surge, Is the Era of ETF 2.0 Approaching?

DOT (Polkadot)

On February 25, Nasdaq submitted a 19b-4 application for the Grayscale DOT ETF (Grayscale Polkadot Trust).

HBAR (Hedera)

On February 24, Nasdaq filed a 19b-4 application with the SEC for HBAR ETF by Canadian investment firm Canary Capital; on March 4, Nasdaq filed a 19b-4 application for Grayscale's Hedera ETF.

Hedera is often seen as a cryptocurrency dark horse. The most anticipated aspect of Hedera is the possibility of a spot HBAR ETF going live, with Valour Funds having submitted an application for a physically backed product on the Euronext exchange in Europe. Meanwhile, Canary Capital has filed an application for a US-based spot HBAR ETF, further raising market expectations as investors closely watch regulatory developments in the post-election environment.

AXL (Axelar)

On March 6, Canary filed an S-1 application for its AXL ETF.

Additionally, former Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Brian Brooks has joined Axelar's new Institutional Advisory Council, focusing on regulatory coordination and institutional adoption.

As previously reported by BlockBeats, Canary Capital has launched the AXL (Axelar) Trust, which will hold the native tokens of the Axelar network, making it the first investment trust to offer exposure to a general-purpose blockchain interoperability protocol.

This trust will provide institutional investors with an opportunity to invest in blockchain interoperability technology, connecting to the Web3 ecosystem, including XRP Ledger, Hedera, Stellar, TON, Sui, Solana, and Bitcoin.

APT (Aptos)

On March 6, Bitwise formally filed an S-1 application with the SEC to register a potential Aptos ETF, taking the first step towards launching an Aptos ETF in the US market.

Aptos is in collaboration with major asset management firms to launch a US-listed ETF, making it one of the few global crypto protocols to achieve this milestone.

Prior to this, Bitwise had already launched the Aptos Staking ETP on the Swiss Stock Exchange in November 2024, allowing for staking of the Aptos token.

How Has the Ethereum ETF Performed Since Approval?

The Ethereum ETF officially debuted on the U.S. capital market on July 23 of last year, with the price of Ethereum around $3200 on that day. Market data shows that the net inflow into the Ethereum ETF in the past six months has been $2.76 billion, equivalent to Wall Street purchasing nearly 1% of Ethereum's volume, while Ethereum's price has now dropped to around $2500.

This is partly due to Grayscale continuously selling off the Ethereum ETF, becoming the market's largest seller, hindering Ethereum's price rise; on the other hand, Ethereum is more severely affected by whale selling pressure compared to Bitcoin, and Ethereum is currently absorbing the potential selling pressure from whales.

However, the good news is that entities related to Trump, such as World Finance Liberty, are continuously increasing their holdings of Ethereum. The net inflow of the ETF and continuous purchases by Trump-related institutions demonstrate the attitude of long-term investors towards Ethereum in an increasingly open policy market environment.

By extension, if the aforementioned altcoin ETFs are approved in 2025, although ETFs in this category will become an inflow window for traditional funds, it does not mean that these tokens will experience a significant upward trend.

Crypto ETF 2.0 Under the Trump Administration

Looking at the history of crypto ETFs, it is easy to see the significant bullishness on the market as a whole following Trump's return to the White House this year. Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas pointed out that before Trump won the election, the approval probability of all assets, except for Litecoin, remained below 5%. It is expected that as the applications enter the approval process and the SEC's decision deadline approaches, the approval probability of cryptocurrency ETFs will continue to rise.

Related Reading: "Coinbase 2025 Outlook: More Crypto ETFs to Come; Stablecoins Still a 'Killer App'"

What Impact Does This Have on the Crypto Market?

Bloomberg analysts expect the SEC to make a decision on the proposed altcoin ETF in October this year. It is foreseeable that if the altcoin ETFs are approved consecutively, future bullish news is likely to continue attracting more conservative and institutional investors, thereby altering the market's investor structure. In this policy environment, the crypto market may experience enhanced liquidity, price surges, and changes in investor structure. Therefore, the approval of more ETF products is also expected to bring more funds into the crypto market, enhance market liquidity, and thus reduce price volatility.

Furthermore, due to regulatory arbitrage, ETFs introduced in the United States may directly trigger imitation in other countries and regions worldwide. This imitation may to varying degrees drive the global adoption of cryptocurrencies, especially in regions with relatively lenient regulations, where cryptocurrency adoption could see accelerated growth. Global policy convergence can not only effectively reduce compliance costs for cross-border transactions but also further eliminate investors' concerns about legal risks, thereby promoting more institutional and individual participation. This trend may accelerate the transition of cryptocurrencies from fringe assets to mainstream financial instruments, boosting their status in the global economy.

As the Trump administration further supports the crypto industry, U.S. states are gradually introducing "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" legislation, combined with the Republican control of both houses of Congress, there may be an opportunity for Congress to pass cryptocurrency-related bills. Once the legislation is passed, cryptocurrencies may have the opportunity to become a new asset class that is neither a security nor a commodity, which would be groundbreaking for the crypto market.

Which Altcoins Could Apply for an ETF?

As the Trump administration continues to loosen crypto regulations, 2025 could see a peak in applications for altcoin ETFs. Some institutions have predicted that the surge in demand for cryptocurrency ETFs will surpass precious metal ETFs in total assets in North America, becoming the third-largest asset class in the rapidly growing $15 trillion ETF industry, second only to stocks and bonds.

Especially for altcoins highly relevant to the U.S., they are more likely to be favored. For example, ONDO (Ondo Finance), as a representative of the RWA track anchoring real-world assets like U.S. bonds, may be the first to receive approval for a tokenized government bond ETF and even become a core target for traditional institutions to allocate crypto assets. If the FIT21 bill is passed within the year, establishing the "Decentralized Protocol Securities Law Exemption" principle, mainstream U.S. DeFi tokens such as UNI (Uniswap), MKR (MakerDAO), AAVE (Aave), etc., may accelerate integration into the traditional financial system.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more