DOJ Did Not Sell Forfeited Samourai Bitcoin, Says White House Crypto Advisor

By: crypto insight|2026/01/19 20:30:00
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways:

  • The White House advisor confirms that Bitcoins forfeited from Samourai Wallet have not been sold by the US government.
  • Rumors were sparked by a significant transfer of 57.5 BTC to a Coinbase Prime deposit address.
  • Executive Order 14233 mandates retaining such assets in a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, not liquidating them.
  • Legislative efforts are ongoing to increase Bitcoin reserves, with proposals to acquire up to 1 million BTC.
  • Former President Trump indicated possible pardons for those involved with Samourai Wallet, addressing complex crypto legal dynamics.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-01-19 11:55:45

In a world where digital currency discussions are increasingly nuanced and intertwined with global financial policies, recent clarifications regarding the U.S. government’s dealings with forfeited Bitcoin have gained significant attention. In particular, discussions have arisen around Bitcoins seized from entities linked with the Samourai Wallet. To address the swirling rumors, White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt has provided reassurance that these assets remain under the control of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, contrary to speculations sparked by notable blockchain activity.

White House Confirms: Samourai Wallet Bitcoins Intact

Amid the complex ecosystem of digital currency, Patrick Witt, executive director of the White House President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has been a beacon of clarity. He confirmed that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has not liquidated the Bitcoins acquired from the Samourai Wallet case, directly addressing misconceptions fueled by recent blockchain transactions.

It’s essential to understand the backdrop of this situation, wherein 57.5 BTC were transferred to a Coinbase Prime deposit address, exciting amateur and seasoned blockchain analysts alike. This move led to rampant speculation about a potential clandestine sale by government authorities, triggering debates over the compliance with Executive Order 14233.

Exploring Executive Order 14233 and Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

Executive Order 14233, signed into effect during the Trump administration, established a clear directive: any Bitcoin obtained through forfeiture—whether through criminal or civil proceedings—must not be sold. Instead, these digital assets should strengthen the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR), which aims to enhance national financial securities and resilience.

This executive order set a precedent, hinting at the strategic foresight by policymakers who acknowledge Bitcoin’s growing relevance in modern economies. Samourai Wallet’s assets, along with other forfeitures, remain integral to this reserve, representing part of a broader strategy to coordinate digital asset management across government entities.

Unpacking Market Reactions to Government-Controlled Bitcoin Transfers

The movement of significant amounts of Bitcoin from government-controlled wallets, such as the 57.5 BTC in question, invariably attracts scrutiny. In this instance, it incited a fervor amongst crypto enthusiasts and experts who speculated on the government’s intentions. Some posited the transfer might signal an impending liquidation, perhaps violating the outlined executive protections.

These speculations took particular aim at the U.S. Marshals Service, responsible for managing forfeited assets. Critics accused the Marshals of potentially breaching established directives, feeding into broader narratives of distrust regarding government transparency in digital asset management.

However, the DOJ’s clarification via Witt dispelled these fears. This assurance underscores the challenge of maintaining transparency in operations that exist at the junction of technology and policy, where digital finance’s novel landscapes continuously intersect with traditional legislative frameworks.

U.S. Government: A Major Player in the Crypto Sphere

Highlighting the magnitude of U.S. holdings in digital assets, public data from Bitcoin Treasuries indicates that the federal government remains a formidable presence in the Bitcoin world. Controlling approximately 328,372 BTC, these assets are valued at a staggering $31 billion at the current market rates. This substantial reserve is far from arbitrary; it includes notable forfeitures, such as an impressive 127,271 BTC seized from an entity based in Cambodia involved in unscrupulous investment practices.

These figures not only reflect the U.S. government’s pivotal role in the crypto landscape but also emphasize the strategic handling of such assets which are crucial for maintaining financial stability. As calls for transparency and prudent management grow, the government’s nuanced handling of these reserves becomes increasingly critical.

The Strategic Expansion of U.S. Bitcoin Reserves

With the Biden administration continuing to navigate the digital financial domain’s complex regulatory environment, policymakers have underscored the importance of strategically enhancing the Bitcoin Reserve. Witt emphasized the need for inter-departmental collaboration—specifically between the Treasury and Commerce departments—to iron out remaining legal and operational kinks.

Efforts are concurrently underway at the legislative level. Senator Cynthia Lummis has proposed ambitious legislation that foresees U.S. Bitcoin reserves growing to one million coins within five years. This target hinges on budget-neutral strategies, ensuring these accumulations do not burden taxpayers. Lummis’s bill highlights progressive thinking, where digital assets are seen as integral to future economic policies.

Pardon Signals: The Legal and Political Climate Surrounding Crypto

The legal ramifications of crypto-related prosecutions have not been without controversy. In the high-profile Samourai Wallet case, developers Keonne Rodriguez and his co-developer, Hill, faced significant legal consequences. Sentenced to serve multiple years in prison, their case paints a complex picture of how legal frameworks intersect with burgeoning crypto technologies.

In a notable twist, former President Donald Trump’s statement about potentially pardoning Rodriguez has added a new layer of intrigue. This move could signal shifts in how future administrations might perceive and engage with crypto industry figures, especially as Trump’s prior pardons of figures like Ross Ulbricht and Changpeng Zhao set noteworthy precedents.

For the Samourai Wallet’s developers, such pardon considerations hit home against a backdrop of claims of politicization and an alleged weaponization of justice processes. These elements further underline the contentious relationship between innovative digital currencies and regulatory bodies grappling with their implications.

Concluding Thoughts: Navigating the Digital Frontier

The U.S. government’s position and strategies related to digital currencies like Bitcoin underscore an acknowledgment of the evolving global financial terrain. While affirmations by White House advisors provide clarity, they also reflect ongoing dialogues within policy and legislative circles. As the dynamics of cryptocurrencies continue to develop, the interplay between regulation and innovation remains a crucial frontier.

In an era where digital assets are claiming their place at the heart of financial systems, understanding government strategies and responses is vital for all stakeholders. The intersecting pathways of policy, law, and technological evolution offer a vignette of the challenges and opportunities in the cryptocurrency arena.

FAQ

What is Executive Order 14233?

Executive Order 14233 is a directive that stipulates Bitcoins acquired through criminal or civil forfeiture must be retained in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve rather than being liquidated. This was signed during the Trump administration to strategically bolster national financial resources.

Why did the U.S. transfer 57.5 BTC to Coinbase Prime?

The transfer of 57.5 BTC from a government-controlled wallet to Coinbase Prime was initially misunderstood as a potential sale, raising questions regarding compliance with EO 14233. However, it was confirmed this was not a sale, and these assets remain part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

How many Bitcoins does the U.S. government currently hold?

Publicly available data suggests that the U.S. government holds approximately 328,372 BTC, making it one of the largest holders globally. These holdings reflect a strategic policy aimed at managing digital assets prudently.

What legislative efforts are underway to increase bitcoin reserves?

Legislation proposed by Senator Cynthia Lummis aims at increasing U.S. Bitcoin reserves to one million BTC over five years. The proposal supports budget-neutral approaches to ensure this strategy does not financially impact taxpayers.

What does former President Trump’s remarks on pardoning suggest for the crypto industry?

Trump’s mention of a potential pardon for Samourai Wallet developers indicates potential shifts in legal attitudes towards crypto-related cases. It mirrors Trump’s previous actions where pardons were granted in high-profile crypto-related prosecutions, hinting at evolving political and legal dialogues in this sector.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more