Everyone is criticizing Shitcoin, let's see how this Shitcoin season plays out!

By: blockbeats|2025/03/05 13:00:03
0
Share
copy
Contributors: Jaleel, BlockBeats; Seigo, Crypto Enthusiast

Buy coins in a bull market, do research in a bear market.

This cycle has been criticizing VC coins all along. Do you know which VC-backed project has the highest token issuance rate? Who has the highest listing rate on trading platforms? If you don't buy VC coins, is it worth getting involved in DeFi projects? Which institutions are worth long-term tracking?

Building on the core metric of "investment project listing efficiency," we have selected a total of 73 VCs, including 35 domestic VCs, 30 foreign VCs, and 8 exchange VCs. We have compiled statistics on the number of projects they have invested in, as well as the listing quantity and probability on the five major exchanges: Binance, Bybit, Upbit, OKEx, and Coinbase. For example, the Binance listing rate = Number of listings on Binance / Total number of investments. We have also introduced exchange weighting parameters that are more in line with the current market landscape: Binance 2, Bybit 1.5, Upbit 1, OKEx & Coinbase 0.7. Finally, we have visualized the information in the most hardcore and intuitive charts to deconstruct the performance of crypto VCs from this perspective.

It is important to note that this report still focuses on the dimension of "investment project listing on exchanges" and does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of VC's overall strength and long-term brand influence. It is for reference only.

Everyone is criticizing Shitcoin, let's see how this Shitcoin season plays out!

Let's Start with the Conclusion

Based on the past listing achievements of each VC's investment projects and the five weighted factors of "BN, Bybit, Upbit, OKEx, Coinbase," the recalculated ranking results show several key changes:

T0 Level: Continue Capital, Placeholder, YZi Labs (Binance Labs), IOSG Ventures, and others still dominate the top tier, but there is a certain differentiation in rankings and scores based on listing on Bybit or Upbit.

T1/T2: Bain Capital Ventures, Mint Ventures, HackVC, and others have gradually entered the high-scoring matrix; Polychain, Multicoin, Paradigm, Zonff Partners, and others continue to maintain stable performance.

T3/T4: OKX Ventures, SNZ Holding, The Spartan Group, Animoca, NGC Ventures, and other VCs that have previously focused on GameFi or specific tracks have also experienced some fluctuations in this ranking.

T5: Funds with relatively smaller sizes or more localized strategies have slightly lower scores in terms of global listing efficiency, but the possibility of future breakthroughs cannot be ruled out.

                   

It is also important to note that projects that are newly listed or have not yet issued tokens are not included in the statistics. Therefore, if a VC focuses on seed rounds, research institutes, and other earlier stages, their potential has not been fully reflected in the listing indicators.

T0: Comprehensive Score >1.5

Key Institutions: Continue Capital; YZi Labs (Binance Labs); IOSG Ventures; Placeholder. As seen in the chart, these four institutions have a distinct "multi-platform, multi-track" characteristic:

Continue Capital: Although the number of investments is relatively small, both ROI and listing rate are quite impressive, living up to its reputation. Continue Capital has consistently maintained a high rate of "listing on BN" and has also shown considerable performance in "listing on Bybit."

YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs): Needless to say, although CZ recently stated that 80% of YZi Labs' investments are losses, the data from this analysis shows that YZi Labs has the highest overall number of investments and projects listed for issuance, holding a unique advantage in its "in-house" channel.

Placeholder: The number of projects is also not high, and the institution is not particularly high-profile in the industry, but the projects invested in have relatively accurate listings. Many investments are focused on the infrastructure track, and post-token issuance, they quickly list on multiple leading exchanges, maintaining a comprehensive score at the T0 level. On another note, Placeholder partner Chris Burniske recently shared his views on the market, stating, "I still believe this is a mid-term market retracement, and the cycle peak is not yet here. Even if Bitcoin continues to decline, it will not change my view. Selling in panic at this moment is not a good idea. Selling now would mean missing out on gains when the market rises."

Summary: T0-level VCs rely on hardcore resources and precise identification of high-quality projects; among them, some VCs with a "trading platform background" can even lead projects to "quick listing," while research-focused VCs climb to the top based on their investment research capabilities.

T1: Overall Score >= 1.2

Representative Institutions: Bain Capital Ventures; HackVC; Mint Ventures; in the new chart, T1-level VCs also show a clear convergence of strength:

Bain Capital Crypto: Makes steady moves with significant amounts, showing more in-depth involvement in individual projects. Its control over "listing on Upbit, listing on Bybit" is becoming stronger.

HackVC: With a high number of diversified investments, as the market share of Bybit, OKX, Coinbase increases, the cases of successfully launching past invested projects are also on the rise;

IOSG Ventures: Well-known for its "wide net, deep research" approach, the successful listing rate fluctuates in the 20-30% range; in the past year, the number of listings on platforms such as Upbit and Bybit has significantly increased.

Mint Ventures: Despite having a smaller project scale, it demonstrates outstanding efficiency, with its "listing on Bybit" reaching 30%+ at one point, embodying a typical "specialized strategy."

Summary: The listing success rate of most projects in the T1 camp is between 15-30%, and they often do not have a significant "weak spot" in terms of trading platforms, showcasing a state of "blooming everywhere."

T2: Overall Score >= 0.9

Multicoin & Pantera: Maintain excellent performance with 20%+ in listings on Binance and Bybit, also have a certain number of listings on Upbit, OKX, Coinbase, but the differentiation is not significant.

ParaFi: With a moderate number of projects, they have been deeply involved in early Ethereum projects, such as the most famous ConsenSys, and participated in many early DeFi projects like Aave; in this analysis, their performance in the "listing on Upbit" segment is slightly lower, but maintaining around 15-20% on OKX and Binance.

Sequoia Capital: A traditional top-tier VC known for its "less is more" strategy. Although they do not make many investments in total, their success rate when projects go mainstream is still decent.

T3: Composite Score >= 0.6

The T3 tier is the most diverse, including well-known heavyweights such as a16z, Coinbase Ventures, and Dragonfly, as well as those backed by exchanges or new funds like Jump Crypto, HTX Ventures (Huobi), and Dao5.

a16z: With a very broad coverage, having invested in over 150 projects, the token listing success rate fluctuates between 10-20%. However, due to the large number of projects, the average quality is somewhat diluted;

Coinbase Ventures: Excluding projects that are listed on Coinbase itself, the listing rate on platforms like Bybit, Binance, and OKX still exceeds 10%;

Dragonfly: A well-established international fund that focuses on early-stage projects, with many DeFi and infrastructure projects successfully launching on mainstream platforms;

Jump Crypto, HTX Ventures (Huobi): With an exchange background, but here we only consider the listing rate of their invested projects on third-party exchanges, so the numbers may not entirely reflect their true resource advantage.

Summary: There are numerous T3 institutions, with the average listing rate mostly ranging from 5-20%. Many of them focus on "early-stage investment" or "building their own ecosystem," rather than making "quick token launches and quick listings" their main strategy.

T4: Composite Score >= 0.3

T4-level VCs often appear mediocre in terms of the "listing efficiency" metric alone, but some institutions have unique advantages in specific sectors or regions:

Animoca: A foundational fund in the GameFi/NFT space, with many of its hundreds of investments not rushing to list, or only being active on DEXs;

LD Capital, GBV: They gained significant exposure in the last bull market but have a rather diversified approach, with an overall listing rate falling in the 5-10% range;

MEXC Ventures: Backed by a trading platform, but this analysis only focuses on third-party projects, so the listing efficiency is naturally lower;

Shima Capital, Arcane Group: More inclined towards an incubation-oriented, regional market layout, with fewer token projects, many of which have not yet reached the CEX listing stage.

Summary: T4 does not mean lack of value, but rather that their strategies are more diverse, leaning more towards the early stage, or most projects are self-sustaining and do not focus on "token issuance + mainstream exchange" as their core goal. It is precisely because of this that this sector is highly likely to nurture the next wave of dark horses. Once some projects enter the tokenization stage later on and successfully list, it will significantly improve their ranking.

VC Regional Distribution: Who is Making a Global Impact?

In the new "VC Regional Distribution" chart, we have rearranged the VC lists of the Exchange Camp, Overseas, and Domestic Camps. It can be seen that:

Exchange Camp: BN, HTX, OKX, Cryptocom, and others still occupy prominent positions in the chart, with YZi Labs being the most conspicuous;

Overseas VC: Traditional giants like Sequoia, Multicoin, Paradigm, and Delphi Digital are still concentrated in the Western world, but there are also some "up-and-coming" institutions with cross-regional layouts;

Domestic VC: Continue Capital, IOSG Ventures, Sequoia China, Puzzle Ventures, and others are further breaking through race tracks and boundaries, showing an increasingly clear trend of global collaborative investment.

In this round of weighting (Binance 2, Bybit 1.5, Upbit 1, Okx & Coinbase 0.7), domestic and overseas institutions that can quickly list on emerging trading platforms like Bybit and Upbit also have higher scoring flexibility.

If VCs focus on independent public chain ecosystems or tokens backed by physical assets, their value-capturing ability under this metric system will be underestimated.

Therefore, the listing rate does not fully measure the VC level. This analysis still focuses only on the single metric of "listing on exchanges," which does not represent the true quality of a project or its long-term return. Other dimensions, such as project revenue, token liquidity, and project failure, were not reflected in this round of weighted ranking.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more