Interpreting the AAVE Buyback Proposal: Is DeFi Finally Embracing Dividends?

By: blockbeats|2025/03/05 10:45:03
0
Share
copy

On March 4th, Aave DAO service provider Marc Zeller released a governance proposal seeking governance approval for the formal Aave Request for Final Comments (ARFC), aimed at reshaping Aave's economic model. It is not a simple adjustment to the existing mechanism but a fundamental upgrade involving revenue distribution, incentive mechanisms, and long-term stability optimization.

The proposal has currently only released the first part and is currently in the consultation phase. Since the proposal's release, the AAVE token has risen to a high of $216, with the current AAVE price at $215, marking a 15.5% increase in the last 24 hours.

Interpreting the AAVE Buyback Proposal: Is DeFi Finally Embracing Dividends?

Interpretation of Proposal Contents

Marc Zeller bluntly stated on X that this is the "most important proposal in Aave's history," illustrating its significant impact. The core pillars of the proposal include:

1. Revenue Redistribution Mechanism

2. AAVE Token Buyback and Distribution Plan

3. Umbrella Security Mechanism

4. LEND Token Retirement

According to the proposal contents, Aave has continuously expanded its market presence over the past two years, building a solid financial foundation.

Despite market fluctuations, Aave has maintained strong revenue growth, with the DeFi protocol's TVL increasing by 115% to reach $115 million. The robust financial position has enabled Aave to drive the tokenomics upgrade while remaining competitive.

Establishment of Aave Finance Committee

One of the core aspects of the proposal is the establishment of the Aave Finance Committee (AFC), which will serve as a key entity within the Aave governance framework, fully responsible for managing Aave's treasury and liquidity strategy. The formation of the AFC signifies Aave's progression towards a more professional and transparent financial management approach.

The main responsibilities of the AFC include overseeing all financial allocations within the Aave ecosystem, ensuring funds are used reasonably and efficiently, and achieving sustainable revenue growth. Additionally, it will develop and execute Aave's liquidity strategies to ensure the protocol maintains adequate liquidity under various market conditions. Most importantly, the AFC will be responsible for assessing and managing various financial risks faced by the Aave protocol, including market, credit, and operational risks.

In order to ensure the professionalism and effectiveness of the AFC, the committee will be supported by core stakeholders including Chaos Labs, TokenLogic, Llamarisk, and ACI. These institutions have a wealth of experience and expertise in the DeFi field and will provide strong support for AFC's decision-making.

Benefiting Stakers, Aave's Revenue Sharing Mechanism

The most eye-catching aspect of this proposal is the significant adjustment to the protocol's revenue distribution mechanism. Aave plans to allocate a portion of the protocol's generated revenue to stkAAVE stakers, more directly linking the protocol's success to the interests of AAVE token holders.

Specifically, Aave plans to introduce a "Fee Switch" mechanism. This mechanism will allow Aave to release excess protocol-generated revenue (such as lending fees) from the treasury and redistribute it to AAVE stakers and users, rather than simply accumulating this revenue in the treasury.

To further optimize the incentive mechanism and enhance the attractiveness of the GHO stablecoin, Aave also plans to introduce Anti-GHO as a new incentive mechanism for GHO, replacing the existing discount model. Anti-GHO is a non-transferable ERC20 token, and its issuance will be directly linked to the income generated by GHO.

At the launch of GHO, Aave utilized the Merit program to test a dividend incentive based on stability fee revenue, with an annual distribution scale reaching $12 million at one point. Today, the program has become self-sustaining, no longer requiring additional stablecoin funding support. This mechanism ties revenue and incentives together, not only enhancing AAVE staking rewards but also avoiding the "power shortage" flaw of a simple fee discount during bull-bear transition cycles.

The specific distribution mechanism is as follows:

1. GHO Fee Generates Anti-GHO: 50% of the GHO fee will be used to generate non-transferable Anti-GHO tokens.

2. The generated Anti-GHO tokens will be distributed in the following ratio: 80% allocated to StkAAVE holders (AAVE stakers), 20% allocated to StkBPT holders (Balancer pool stakers).

3. The original GHO fee discount will be discontinued, replaced by a profit-sharing mechanism based on protocol revenue.

Anti-GHO holders have two ways to use it:

1. 1:1 Burn to Offset GHO Debt: Holders can burn Anti-GHO at a 1:1 ratio to offset their GHO debt.

2. Convert to StkGHO: Holders can also choose to convert Anti-GHO to StkGHO to receive GHO staking rewards.

However, the implementation of Anti-GHO will require additional development and audit, or it will be formally activated in a subsequent "Aavenomics Part Two" proposal.

Initiating Buyback

In addition to revenue sharing, Aave also plans to launch an ambitious AAVE token buyback program. Over the next six months, Aave will allocate $1 million weekly towards repurchasing AAVE tokens, and this program will be overseen and executed by the newly formed Aave Finance Committee (AFC).

The AFC can execute buybacks directly or collaborate with market makers to buy AAVE from the secondary market. The repurchased tokens will be allocated to Aave's ecosystem reserve to support the long-term development of the ecosystem.

As the financial service provider for the Aave DAO, TokenLogic will plan the buyback strategy based on the protocol's overall budget, aiming to ultimately cover and surpass all AAVE-related expenses within the Aave ecosystem while maintaining prudent fund management.

With the expansion of Aave's new revenue streams by 2025, the AFC may propose an increase in the buyback budget. TokenLogic will adjust funding sources and strategies monthly based on the asset allocation of the Aave treasury.

Enhancing Protocol Operation Security and Efficiency

To further enhance the protocol's security and increase capital efficiency, Aave plans to introduce the "Umbrella" mechanism. Umbrella will integrate collateral and liquidity management to effectively mitigate default risks and liquidity crises. This is seen as a significant upgrade to the existing Safety Module.

The key advantages of the Umbrella mechanism include:

1. Robust Default Protection: Umbrella will provide Aave with a robust default protection mechanism, enhancing its resilience to market fluctuations and potential risks, especially in the backdrop of frequent hacks in the DeFi space.

2. Attracting Institutional Users: Umbrella's institutional-grade risk management capability will help attract more institutional users to participate in the Aave ecosystem, enhancing the protocol's on-chain asset management security.

3. Cross-Chain Deployment: The Umbrella system will be deployed across multiple blockchain networks such as Ethereum, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Base, and others, achieving broader applicability and higher security.

Furthermore, the Anti-GHO mechanism will also be integrated into Umbrella, making the repayment or conversion of GHO debt into interest-bearing StkGHO more straightforward and convenient. Aave currently faces a $27 million annual liquidity cost, and the introduction of the Umbrella mechanism will effectively enhance capital efficiency.

Lastly, the proposal also plans to complete the full retirement of the LEND token. LEND was Aave's original governance token before being upgraded to AAVE in 2020. Since 2020, the LEND token has been in a transitional period towards AAVE migration.

The proposal plans to finalize the retirement of the LEND token by freezing the LEND migration contract and reclaiming 320,000 unswapped AAVE tokens (currently valued at approximately $65 million). The proposal states that the community has had ample time to complete the token swaps, thus suggesting a formal closure of the migration process. The reclaimed funds will be allocated by Aave governance for specific purposes, such as ecosystem growth, security upgrades, or token burning.

This initiative will help address legacy issues in Aave governance, improving the protocol's operational efficiency. Additionally, unlocking these underutilized funds will further strengthen Aave's financial resilience, providing more abundant resources for its future development.

Next Blue Chip in Turbulent Times? How Does the Community View This Proposal

Currently, the proposal is still in the ARFC (Request For Comment) stage, and the community can discuss it on the Aave Governance Forum. The next step of the proposal will involve gathering community feedback and striving for consensus before proceeding to an offline Snapshot vote. If approved, the proposal will formally enter the on-chain governance proposal (AIP), and if successfully executed, buyback and other plans will commence in 2025.

Community members calculate that AAVE holders can potentially receive around a 3% annualized return through this proposal. Although the absolute numerical value may not seem outstanding, Aave has established its core position in the entire DeFi ecosystem, demonstrating traits akin to high-quality blue-chip stocks in traditional financial markets. With its robust operations, sustained growth, and clear revenue model, Aave has attracted the attention of more and more rational investors.

During an economic downturn, these types of assets typically have strong defensiveness, providing investors with relatively stable returns and a peace of mind holding experience. Of particular note is that as the global regulatory environment gradually relaxes and recognizes the DeFi sector, there is a possibility of reevaluating the value of DeFi assets. Therefore, redefining Aave as a "blue-chip" asset in the cryptocurrency market's new order carries ample rationale and forward-looking significance. It not only represents a conservative investment strategy but also heralds a certain trend in the future development of the DeFi sector.

Additionally, White House AI and cryptocurrency czar David Sacks has indicated a potential rollback of the so-called "DeFi Broker Rule" — the last-minute attack by the Biden administration on the crypto community.

The DeFi Broker Rule is a regulatory framework for decentralized finance (DeFi) intermediary service providers (such as trading platforms, lending protocols, etc.), aimed at ensuring compliance, user protection, and risk management. Core components include anti-money laundering (AML), know your customer (KYC), smart contract audits, fund security, and transparency requirements.

Reversing the DeFi Broker Rule means that DeFi protocols are not required to report and disclose customer information, easing the regulatory pressure on DeFi, which is also a positive development for Aave.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more