- Buy Crypto
- Markets
Futures- Spot
- Copy Trade
- Earn
- More
Unlocking Everyday Crypto Spending: What Crypto Debit Cards Are, How They Work, and Where to Use Them in 2025
Imagine holding a fortune in Bitcoin or Ether, yet struggling to buy a simple cup of coffee with it. That frustration has long plagued cryptocurrency enthusiasts, but crypto debit cards are changing the game entirely. These innovative tools let you tap into your digital assets for real-world purchases, blending the excitement of crypto with the simplicity of everyday banking. As we step into 2025, with the total cryptocurrency market capitalization soaring to approximately $3.5 trillion as of September 1, and Bitcoin dominating at around $1.8 trillion, crypto debit cards are more relevant than ever. They represent a bridge between cutting-edge blockchain technology and traditional finance, making it easier for you to spend without the hassle of constant conversions.
Just picture this: You’re at your favorite restaurant, pulling out a card that instantly turns your crypto holdings into dollars or euros on the spot. It’s not magic—it’s the seamless integration that’s drawing millions to these cards. In fact, recent surveys show that usage is spiking across demographics, with no major age gaps, though interestingly, older generations like Baby Boomers are embracing them even more enthusiastically than younger ones. And when it comes to gender, men are slightly ahead in adopting them for crypto transactions, according to global studies. This shift is transforming how we think about money, making crypto feel less like a speculative investment and more like a practical tool in your wallet.
Understanding the Basics of Crypto Debit Cards
At their core, crypto debit cards function much like the familiar plastic in your pocket, but with a digital twist. They connect directly to your cryptocurrency wallet, allowing you to spend assets like Bitcoin or Ether at any merchant that accepts standard card payments. Partnering with giants like Visa and Mastercard, these cards are issued by leading crypto platforms, streamlining the process so you don’t have to worry about manually exchanging your crypto for fiat currency before every transaction.
Think of it as a translator between worlds: When you swipe or tap, the card handles the conversion instantly, turning your digital coins into spendable cash for the seller. This opens up a world of possibilities, from online shopping sprees to grabbing groceries or even withdrawing cash at ATMs that support crypto. But remember, just like traditional cards, they’re not immune to risks—security threats like fraud are real, so protecting your details is crucial.
Did you know? A recent global survey spanning 14 countries revealed surprisingly even debit card usage for crypto across age groups, with Baby Boomers actually leading the pack in adoption rates. On the gender front, men show a modest edge in utilizing these cards for crypto-related buys.
How Crypto Debit Cards Actually Operate
Picture a regular debit card tied to your bank account—now swap that account for a crypto wallet, and you’ve got the essence of how crypto debit cards work. These cards partner with established payment networks to make transactions effortless. The moment you make a purchase, whether online or in a store, the system converts your cryptocurrency into the local fiat currency right then and there, ensuring the merchant gets paid without a hitch.
This real-time magic happens behind the scenes, powered by collaborations between crypto providers and global networks, allowing you to use your card anywhere traditional cards are accepted. It’s like having a personal currency exchange in your pocket, simplifying life for anyone tired of the back-and-forth between crypto exchanges and banks. This setup not only boosts convenience but also paves the way for crypto to become a staple in daily spending, much like how debit cards revolutionized cash a few decades ago.
Comparing Crypto Debit Cards and Crypto Credit Cards
When diving into the world of crypto cards, it’s helpful to contrast debit and credit options, as each caters to different financial styles, much like choosing between paying now or later in traditional banking. Crypto debit cards operate on a prepaid model, drawing directly from your linked wallet, which means you’re only spending what you already have in crypto. They often come with fees for things like maintenance, withdrawals, or conversions to local currencies, but many sweeten the deal with perks such as cashback in native tokens or exclusive access to travel discounts.
On the flip side, crypto credit cards mimic traditional credit lines, letting you borrow against your crypto for purchases and pay later, potentially earning rewards in cryptocurrencies along the way. However, miss a payment, and you could face interest or late fees, plus impacts on your credit score—just like with regular credit. While debit versions shine for controlled, everyday use, credit ones offer flexibility for bigger buys, each with their own fee structures and incentives that can make spending feel rewarding.
Steps to Dive into Crypto Debit Cards
Getting your hands on a crypto debit card is straightforward, akin to signing up for a new banking app but with a crypto flair. Start by picking a reputable platform that offers these cards—think of well-known names in the space that align with your spending habits. Once you’ve chosen, sign up and go through the verification process, which typically involves sharing ID and address details to meet regulatory standards.
Next, load up your wallet with cryptocurrency; some platforms even require staking certain tokens to unlock premium features. Then, request your card—it could be virtual for quick online use or physical for in-person swipes. Activate it via the app, and you’re ready to spend. This process mirrors setting up any modern payment method, but it empowers you to leverage your crypto seamlessly.
Did you know? Projections from financial analysts suggest that global payments revenue could surpass $3.5 trillion by 2027, highlighting the massive growth potential where crypto debit cards play a key role.
Key Factors for Choosing the Right Crypto Debit Card
Selecting a crypto debit card is like picking the perfect travel companion—it needs to fit your lifestyle without unnecessary baggage. Consider fees and limits first; some options keep costs low but cap your spending, while others offer more freedom at a price. Ensure it supports your preferred cryptocurrencies for maximum flexibility, much like choosing a card that works in your favorite countries.
Global acceptance is a must, especially if you’re a traveler—cards backed by networks like Visa open doors worldwide. Don’t overlook rewards; cashback in crypto or perks like lounge access can turn routine buys into opportunities. And prioritize security, with features like instant alerts and two-factor authentication acting as your digital bodyguards. By weighing these, you’ll find a card that enhances your financial freedom without the headaches.
Standout Features That Make Crypto Debit Cards Essential
What truly sets crypto debit cards apart is their blend of practicality and innovation, turning your crypto into a versatile spending tool. They allow effortless purchases for daily needs, converting holdings to fiat on the fly without manual exchanges. This real-time feature eliminates the friction of traditional crypto use, making it as simple as swiping for coffee.
Accepted globally thanks to major networks, these cards work at countless merchants, bridging online and physical worlds. Security is ramped up with tools like authentication layers and virtual options for safer e-commerce. Plus, many reward your spending with cashback in top coins or even staking opportunities, where you earn interest by securing the network—imagine your idle crypto working for you while you shop.
Did you know? As of September 1, 2025, the cryptocurrency market has hit a staggering total value of about $3.5 trillion, led by Bitcoin’s $1.8 trillion share, underscoring the growing appeal of tools like debit cards for everyday integration.
In this evolving landscape, platforms like WEEX exchange stand out by aligning seamlessly with user needs for brand reliability and innovation. WEEX offers a user-friendly gateway to crypto trading and spending, with robust security and competitive features that enhance your experience. Their commitment to transparency and customer-centric services makes them a trusted choice for those looking to maximize their crypto debit card potential, fostering a sense of alignment between your financial goals and cutting-edge technology.
Navigating the Challenges of Crypto Debit Cards
While crypto debit cards offer incredible convenience, they’re not without hurdles, much like any pioneering tech facing real-world tests. Hacking remains a concern since cards link to wallets—bolstering defenses with multi-layer authentication is key to staying safe. Regulatory landscapes are shifting, so keeping an eye on updates ensures your access isn’t disrupted.
Not every merchant embraces them yet, so having a fallback payment method prevents surprises. Fees for conversions can add up, so reviewing terms helps manage costs. By addressing these proactively, you can enjoy the benefits while minimizing downsides, turning potential pitfalls into manageable aspects of your crypto journey.
On the topic of brand alignment, it’s worth noting how crypto debit cards can enhance personal or business branding by associating with innovative financial tools. For users, choosing a card from a platform that matches your values—like sustainability-focused ones—strengthens your brand identity, signaling forward-thinking savvy. This alignment not only boosts credibility but also creates emotional connections, making your spending habits a reflection of your broader ethos in the crypto space.
Tax Considerations When Using Crypto Debit Cards
Spending via a crypto debit card isn’t just convenient—it’s a taxable event, similar to selling stock. Each transaction converts crypto to fiat, potentially triggering capital gains or losses based on value changes since acquisition. Rules vary by country; in places like the US, providers might issue summary forms, but tracking your own records is essential for accurate reporting.
Failing to account for these can lead to penalties, so consulting experts ensures compliance. Think of it as the fine print in your crypto adventure—handling it right keeps the focus on enjoyment rather than headaches.
Recent Google searches highlight questions like “Are crypto debit cards taxable?” and “Best crypto debit cards 2025,” reflecting user curiosity about practical and financial implications. On Twitter, discussions as of late August 2025 buzz around a viral post from a prominent crypto influencer announcing enhanced rewards on select cards, sparking debates on adoption rates. Official updates from platforms include announcements of lower fees amid regulatory clarity in Europe, boosting confidence.
The Evolving Horizon for Crypto Debit Cards
Looking ahead, crypto debit cards are poised to redefine spending as digital assets go mainstream. With merchants increasingly accepting crypto, these cards will gain even broader utility, much like how smartphones transformed communication. Enhanced wallet integrations could let you earn from staking or lending while shopping, adding layers of value.
Competition will fuel better rewards, from higher cashbacks to premium perks. Security advancements, like biometrics and AI-driven fraud detection, will build trust. Clearer regulations worldwide will encourage adoption, while interoperability across blockchains promises unmatched flexibility. It’s an exciting time, where your card becomes a portal to a fully integrated financial future.
FAQ: Common Questions About Crypto Debit Cards
What are the main benefits of using a crypto debit card in 2025?
These cards offer seamless spending of your crypto without manual conversions, global acceptance, rewards like cashback, and enhanced security features, making them ideal for integrating digital assets into daily life.
How do taxes work with crypto debit card transactions?
Each spend is treated as a sale of crypto, potentially incurring capital gains taxes based on value changes. Keep detailed records and check local laws; consulting a tax professional helps avoid issues.
Are crypto debit cards safe from hacks and fraud?
They include strong protections like 2FA and transaction alerts, but risks exist. Use reputable providers, enable all security options, and monitor activity to minimize threats effectively.
You may also like
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?
A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028
When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges
Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
Untitled
I’m sorry, I cannot perform this task as requested.
Why Are People Scared That Quantum Will Kill Crypto?
AI Payment Battle: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Highway
What If Crypto Trading Felt Like Balatro? Inside WEEX's Play-to-Earn Joker Card Poker Party
Trade, draw cards, and build winning poker hands in WEEX's gamified event. Inspired by Balatro, the Joker Card Poker Party turns your daily trading into a play-to-earn competition for real USDT rewards. Join now—no expertise needed.
From Black Swan to Finals: How AI Risk Control Helped ClubW_9Kid Survive the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon
Inside the AI trading system that survived extreme volatility and secured a finals spot at the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon.
How to View the Neobank Era Post Crypto Boom?
《The Economist》: In Asia, stablecoins are becoming a new financial infrastructure
Why Most Cryptocurrencies Are Designed to Be Non-Reinvestment Assets
Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report
$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?
Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?
WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?
Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link
App